Reid v. Clarity Services, Inc.
| Nicholas Reid |
| Clarity Services, Inc. |
| 8:2026cv00582 |
| March 4, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER re #13 Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice. This action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 4/14/2026. (SMB)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Nicholas Reid (Geiger, Bryan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RPB) |
|
Filing 11
60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL re #10 Notice of Settlement. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 3/31/2026. (SMB)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of settlement by Nicholas Reid (Geiger, Bryan) |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Nicholas Reid. (Geiger, Bryan) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on March 11, 2026 by Nicholas Reid as to Clarity Services, Inc.. (Geiger, Bryan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Order Referring Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge for IDEAL Program. See attached Order for important deadlines and information about the IDEAL Program. (KMN) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER regarding Discovery Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 3/10/2026. (KMN)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Clarity Services, Inc. (CTR) |
| Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:26-cv-00582-JSM-TGW. (JOS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Nicholas Reid. Related case(s): No (Geiger, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Bryan James Geiger on behalf of Nicholas Reid. Lead Counsel: Bryan J. Geiger. (Geiger, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clarity Services, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24559880) filed by Nicholas Reid. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Geiger, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reid v. Clarity Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicholas Reid | |
| Represented By: | Bryan James Geiger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Clarity Services, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
