Swint v. Trump et al
| Robert James Swint |
| Donald John Trump, Supreme Court of the United States, The People of the United States and Wyd-Hams Membership Services |
| 8:2026cv01122 |
| April 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Natalie Hirt Adams |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 USCA Order Issued as a Mandate - Dismissed for Want of Prosecution as to #3 Notice of Appeal filed by Robert James Swint. USCA number: 26-11572-F. ***Stay lifted. (MCB) |
| ***11th Circuit Case Number: 26-11572-F for #3 Notice of Appeal filed by Robert James Swint. (MCB) |
| Filing 4 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to the U.S. Court of Appeals - 11th Circuit re #3 Notice of Appeal. Filing fee not paid. (JDR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #2 Order by Robert James Swint. Filing fee not paid. ***Case Stayed. (JDR) |
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk to close this case and to send to Swint a civil rights complaint form. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 4/20/2026. (LSC)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Supreme Court of the United States, The People of the United States, Donald John Trump, Wyd-Hams Membership Services filed by Robert James Swint. (No Fee, No IFP) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
