Rhinehart v. The Kearney Companies, LLC
Plaintiff: Brendon Rhinehart
Defendant: The Kearney Companies, LLC
Case Number: 8:2026cv01131
Filed: April 20, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Sean P Flynn
Referring Judge: James S Moody
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff shall answer the Court's interrogatories within 20 days. (See Order for additional details and instructions.) Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 6/4/2026. (SMB)
June 3, 2026 Filing 12 Minute Entry. Virtual Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE held on 6/3/2026. (DIGITAL) (KMN)
June 3, 2026 Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by The Kearney Companies, LLC.(Thompson, Eric)
May 28, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE of hearing: re: #3 Notice of Referral to IDEAL Program Case Management Conference set for 6/3/2026 at 11:00 AM in Zoom Video Conference before Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. (Note: Zoom instructions will be sent by separate notice.)(KMN)
May 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. The Kearney Companies, LLC's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to June 3, 2026. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/8/2026. (SMB)
May 8, 2026 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by The Kearney Companies, LLC. (Thompson, Eric)
May 1, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE by Brendon Rhinehart of Counsel's Unavailability from July 1, 2026 to July 22, 2026 (Printy, Gary)
April 27, 2026 Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on 4/22/2026 by Brendon Rhinehart as to The Kearney Companies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Printy, Gary)
April 21, 2026 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to The Kearney Companies, LLC. (AW)
April 21, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE of Order Referring Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge for IDEAL Program. See attached Order for important deadlines and information about the IDEAL Program. (KMN)
April 20, 2026 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:26-cv-1131-JSM-SPF. (ARL)
April 20, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Kearney Companies, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24808172) filed by Brendon Rhinehart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Printy, Gary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhinehart v. The Kearney Companies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brendon Rhinehart
Represented By: Gary Printy, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kearney Companies, LLC
Represented By: Eric R. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?