Certified Training Solutions, LLC v. ConvenientMD, LLC et al
| Certified Training Solutions, LLC |
| ConvenientMD, LLC, Diane Willey, Marie Hall, Caitlin Morse, Melody Barry, Derek Nelson, Katelyn Dalton, Diana Tereshchuk and Victoria Cline |
| 8:2026cv01156 |
| April 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Cameron G. Shilling on behalf of ConvenientMD, LLC. Lead Counsel: Cameron G. Shilling. (Shilling, Cameron) |
| Filing 16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by ConvenientMD, LLC identifying Corporate Parent ConvenientMD Holding, LLC for ConvenientMD, LLC. (Shilling, Cameron) Modified text on 6/8/2026 (LAW). |
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER granting Defendant ConvenientMD, LLC's #13 Unopposed Motion for Aaron R. Fenton to Appear Pro Hac Vice. If counsel has not already done so, within fourteen (14) days hereof, he shall complete the e-filer registration (more information available at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 6/4/2026. (EE)
|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Defendant Marie Hall's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer the Complaint. Accordingly, no later than June 25, 2026, Defendant Marie Hall shall respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 6/4/2026. (EE)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Aaron R. Fenton to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-25060793 for $150 by ConvenientMD, LLC. (Simmons, Tori) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Marie Hall. (Simmons, Tori) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting Defendant ConvenientMD, LLC's #10 Unopposed Motion for Special Admission as to attorney Cameron G. Shilling. If counsel has not already done so, within fourteen (14) days hereof, he shall complete the e-filer registration (more information available at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 5/29/2026. (EE)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Cameron G. Shilling to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-25033318 for $150 by ConvenientMD, LLC. (Simmons, Tori) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Defendant ConvenientMD LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. ConvenientMD, LLC's response to Plaintiff's Complaint due 6/25/2026. Signed by Senior Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 5/27/2026. (JDE)
|
| Filing 8 Time Sensitive MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by ConvenientMD, LLC. (Simmons, Tori) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Certified Training Solutions, LLC. Related case(s): No (Weber, Julia) |
| Filing 6 Copyright Report electronically sent to the U.S. Copyright Office. (JOS) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to ConvenientMD, LLC, Marie Hall. (JOS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CAB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CAB) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:26-cv-1156-CEH-CPT. (RLD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24828172) filed by Certified Training Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Proposed Summons, #9 Proposed Summons)(Weber, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.