Danforth v. Options for Seniors, Inc. et al
| Julie Danforth |
| Options for Seniors, Inc. and Payday, Inc. |
| 8:2026cv01184 |
| April 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Options for Seniors, Inc., Payday, Inc..(Shumans, Diana) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Options for Seniors, Inc., Payday, Inc. Related case(s): Yes (Shumans, Diana) Modified text on 6/8/2026 (CTR). |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Options for Seniors, Inc., Payday, Inc. (Shumans, Diana) Modified text on 6/8/2026 (CTR). |
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Unopposed Motion #10 to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1. Defendants shall file an answer or other response to the Complaint on or before June 5, 2026. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 5/26/2026. (KMF)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Options for Seniors, Inc., Payday, Inc. (Shumans, Diana) Modified on 5/26/2026 to edit text. (JVC) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Diana K. Shumans on behalf of Options for Seniors, Inc., Payday, Inc. Lead Counsel: Diana K. Shumans. (Shumans, Diana) Modified on 5/26/2026 to edit text. (JVC) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on May 4, 2026 by Julie Danforth as to Payday, Inc. (Brinson, J.) Modified on 5/5/2026 to edit docket text. (WLB). |
| Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on May 4, 2026 by Julie Danforth as to Options for Seniors, Inc. (Brinson, J.) Modified on 5/5/2026 to edit docket text. (WLB). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CRB) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants. (ARL) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by J. Kemp Brinson on behalf of Julie Danforth. Lead Counsel: J. Kemp Brinson. (Brinson, J.) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Julie Danforth. (Brinson, J.) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:26-cv-1184-MSS-SPF. (RLD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Options for Seniors, Inc., Payday, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24841228) filed by Julie Danforth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC Notice of Right to Sue - Options for Seniors, Inc., #2 Exhibit B - EEOC Notice of Right to Sue - Payday, Inc., #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Brinson, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.