Holland v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
| Kaitlin Holland |
| Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Gerber Products Company, Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Plum, PBC, The Campbell's Company and Walmart, Inc. |
| 8:2026cv01291 |
| May 1, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Natalie Hirt Adams |
| James S Moody |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the California Northern District as case 3:26-cv-05369, filed 06/09/2026. (JNB) |
| Filing 5 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel order transferring case to: Northern District of California MDL case number: 3101 (AJS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Kaitlin Holland. Related case(s): Yes (Hare, Eli) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. New case number: 8:26-cv-1291-JSM-NHA. (AA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Eli Joseph Hare on behalf of Kaitlin Holland. Lead Counsel: Eli J. Hare. (Hare, Eli) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24884052) filed by Kaitlin Holland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appendix)(Hare, Eli) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
