Green et al v. Restaurant Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Clifton G Green and Tina Green
Defendant: Restaurant Technologies, Inc.
Pretrial Services: Carlos J. Burruezo
Case Number: 8:2026cv01613
Filed: May 29, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Hernandez Covington
Referring Judge: Lindsay S Griffin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2026 Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Restaurant Technologies, Inc. (Mason, W) Modified text on 7/13/2026 (CTR).
July 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ENDORSED ORDER granting the unopposed motions to appear pro hac vice. Docs. #22, #23. Attorney Gray Mateo-Harris and Erin S. Johnson must submit a "Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration" through PACER. As explained in the Court's Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing, failure to register for CM/ECF may result in the lawyer's termination from the docket, the lawyer's not receiving a copy of papers filed in the case, or the dismissal of the action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lindsay S. Griffin on 7/10/2026. (ML)
July 9, 2026 Filing 23 Unopposed MOTION for Erin S. Johnson to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-25232139 for $150 by Restaurant Technologies, Inc. (Mason, W) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Lindsay S. Griffin. Modified on 7/10/2026 to edit text. (JVC)
July 9, 2026 Filing 22 Unopposed MOTION for Gray Mateo-Harris to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-25232089 for $150 by Restaurant Technologies, Inc. (Mason, W) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Lindsay S. Griffin. Modified on 7/10/2026 to edit text. (JVC)
July 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER regarding motions for summary judgment. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/6/2026. (GSO)
July 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ENDORSED ORDER: In light of the Court's #19 Case Management and Scheduling Order, no case management hearing will be held. Additionally, in order to keep cases moving on track, the Court has found it necessary to impose some restrictions on the types and number of extensions to case management deadlines that it grants. Thus, the parties are advised that, while short extensions, especially if unopposed, will be favorably considered, the Court will not substantially move the dispositive motions deadline or the trial date. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/6/2026. (GSO)
July 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 19 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by February 25, 2027. Dispositive motions due by April 30, 2027. Pretrial Conference scheduled for September 16, 2027, at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 14B before Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington. Jury Trial scheduled for October 4, 2027, at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 14B before Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington. Conduct mediation by February 24, 2027. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/6/2026. (GSO)
June 29, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ENDORSED ORDER: On June 5, 2026, Defendant filed its motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (Doc. #7). On June 26, 2026, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. (Doc. #16). In light of Plaintiffs' amended complaint, Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. #7) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/29/2026. (ATI)
June 26, 2026 Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Wiggs, Scott)
June 26, 2026 Filing 16 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT document by Clifton G Green, Tina Green. Amended Complaint. (Wiggs, Scott) Modified text on 6/29/2026 (AA).
June 26, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ENDORSED ORDER: On June 11, 2026, the parties were directed to file a completed uniform Case Management Report by June 25, 2026. (Doc. # 11). However, no Case Management Report has been filed. Accordingly, the parties are directed to file the Case Management Report no later than June 29, 2026. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/26/2026. (ATI)
June 23, 2026 Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Clifton G Green, Tina Green. (Wiggs, Scott)
June 23, 2026 Filing 13 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Clifton G Green, Tina Green. Related case(s): Yes (Wiggs, Scott)
June 12, 2026 Filing 12 NOTICE by Restaurant Technologies, Inc. re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim of Local Rule 3.01(g) Supplemental Certification (Mason, W)
June 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by June 25, 2026, file a completed uniform Case Management Report. The Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery in the vast majority of cases. If the parties believe that more than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. After the Case Management Report is filed, the Court will determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/11/2026. (ATI)
June 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Count VII of the complaint, the FWCA retaliation claim, is severed and remanded to state court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. But all other counts of the complaint will remain in this Court and the case remains open as to those claims. The Clerk is directed to remand the FWCA claim accordingly. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/11/2026. (ATI)
June 9, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Restaurant Technologies, Inc. Related case(s): Yes (Mason, W) Modified on 6/10/2026 to edit docket text. (AR)
June 9, 2026 Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 5 Order filed by Restaurant Technologies, Inc.. (Mason, W)
June 5, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Restaurant Technologies, Inc.. (Mason, W)
June 2, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c). -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (GSO)
June 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER: "Federal law prohibits the removal of certain types of actions by designating them as non-removable." Avery v. Wawa, Inc., No. 8:18-cv-403-VMC-TGW, 2018 WL 1008443, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 22, 2018) (citing 28 U.S.C. 1445). In particular, civil actions brought in state court "arising under the workmen's compensation laws of such State may not be removed to any district court of the United States." 28 U.S.C. 1445(c). "The Eleventh Circuit has held that retaliation claims brought under Chapter 440.205 of Florida's Workers' Compensation laws fall within the ambit of 28 U.S.C. 1445(c) and that such removed claims must be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction." Avery, 2018 WL 1008443, at *1; see also Reed v. Heil Co., 206 F.3d 1055, 1061 (11th Cir. 2000) (remanding Alabama workers' compensation retaliation claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1445(c)); Alansari v. Tropic Star Seafood, Inc., 388 Fed. Appx. 902, 905 (11th Cir. 2010) ("[B]ecause the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Alansari's [Florida] state workers' compensation retaliation claim, we conclude that it erred in refusing to remand the claim to state court."). Here, the complaint contains a Florida Workers' Compensation Act retaliation claim (Count VII) that is non-removable, along with otherwise removable claims under Title VII, the ADA, the FMLA, and Florida law. (Doc. # [1-1]). Yet, Defendant has removed the case. (Doc. #1). Accordingly, Defendant is directed to show cause by June 9, 2026, why this case--or at least the retaliation claim-- should not be remanded to state court. Defendant must address whether the entire case should be remanded or whether the retaliation claim should be severed and remanded alone. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/2/2026. (ATI)
June 1, 2026 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Restaurant Technologies, Inc.. (Mason, W)
June 1, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Scott Braxton Wiggs of Local Rule 2.01(a), which requires membership or special admission in the Middle District bar to practice in the Middle District, except for the limited exceptions identified in the Rule. To apply for membership in the Middle District, visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LNR)
June 1, 2026 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Lindsay S. Griffin. New case number: 8:26-cv-01613-VMC-LSG. (LNR)
May 29, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County, case number 26-CA-004713 filed in State Court on 04/28/2026. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-25034063 filed by Restaurant Technologies, Inc.(Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mason, W) Modified text on 6/1/2026 (LNR).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green et al v. Restaurant Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clifton G Green
Represented By: Scott Braxton Wiggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Green
Represented By: Scott Braxton Wiggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Restaurant Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Gray Israelina Mateo-Harris
Represented By: Erin Johnson
Represented By: W Scott Mason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Pretrial services: Carlos J. Burruezo
Represented By: Carlos J. Burruezo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?