Batista v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al
| Kayle Batista |
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., and Capital One Bank, N.A |
| 8:2026cv01946 |
| July 7, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Capital One Bank, N.A identifying Corporate Parent Capital One Financial Corporation for Capital One Bank, N.A.. (Mathews, Ellen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Ellen T. Mathews on behalf of Capital One Bank, N.A. Lead Counsel: Ellen T. Mathews. (Mathews, Ellen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Capital One Bank, N.A. Related case(s): No (Mathews, Ellen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA, case number 2026CC003957 filed in State Court on 05/28/2026. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-25217670 filed by Capital One Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Ex. A-1, #2 State Court Docket Sheet Ex. A-2, #3 State Court Other Documents Ex. A-3, #4 Exhibit Ex. B, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mathews, Ellen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
