Jover et al v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Eisen Pabiona Jover and Kris Labrador Jover |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union LLC and Hughes Federal Credit Union |
| 8:2026cv02087 |
| July 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Eisen Pabiona Jover, Kris Labrador Jover. (Warshaw, Max) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Max Joseph Warshaw on behalf of Eisen Pabiona Jover, Kris Labrador Jover. Lead Counsel: Max Warshaw. (Warshaw, Max) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Eisen Pabiona Jover, Kris Labrador Jover. (Warshaw, Max) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Hughes Federal Credit Union, Trans Union LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-25284199) filed by Eisen Pabiona Jover, Kris Labrador Jover. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons as to Equifax, #3 Proposed Summons as to Experian, #4 Proposed Summons as to Trans Union)(Warshaw, Max) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
