Garcia v. Wilson et al
| Matt Garcia |
| Rowan Wilson, Michael Rosenthal, Vanessa Fang and Kevin Mcclanahan |
| 8:2026cv02104 |
| July 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Natalie Hirt Adams |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER: In this pro se case, Plaintiff has filed a two sentence complaint stating that the Defendants have undisclosed interests, and the Court should order them to disclose. Plaintiff presents no true case or controversy -- the claims in this case are nonjusticable and not subject to cure. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 7/23/2026. (ANL)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Matt Garcia - A pro se litigant may consent to receive Notices of Electronic Filings by completing the consent form linked #here or by visiting the court's website at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/litigants-without-lawyers. (LD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Matt Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Matt Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.