Battle v. American Express Company et al
| David D. Battle, Jr. |
| American Express Company, Transworld Systems Inc., Firstsource Advantage, LLC, Radius Global Solutions, LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union LLC |
| 8:2026cv02429 |
| August 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Gregory D Pizzo |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff's "Motion to Appear Virtually at All Hearings" (Doc. #4) is denied. Plaintiff is advised that he filed suit in this District, and in doing so, despite proceeding pro se, he is expected to be present at any court-ordered hearings and/or case management conferences just as an attorney of record is expected to be present. Plaintiff is reminded that even pro se plaintiffs must conform with procedural rules, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Middle District of Florida. Litigation - particularly in federal court - is difficult, and Plaintiff should consider hiring an attorney. If he is unable to afford counsel, he should consider the resources available to pro se litigants, including the Legal Information Program operated by the Tampa Bay Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, and the Middle District of Florida's guide to assist pro se litigants proceeding in federal court, which is located on the Court's website. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 8/24/2026. (RL)
|
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff's "Motion for Electronic Filing Access and Registration for CM/ECF" (Doc. #3) is denied. "It is the District's preferred policy to disallow pro se litigants access to electronic filing unless extenuating circumstances exist to justify waiving CM/ECF procedures." Fisher v. District School Bd. of Collier County, No. 2:10-cv-512-FtM-29SPC, 2010 WL 3522215, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 7, 2010). Plaintiff has not shown good cause or extenuating circumstances warranting an exception to this policy. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 8/24/2026. (RL)
|
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER: Upon review, the Court finds the complaint (Doc. #1) constitutes an impermissible shotgun pleading. See Weiland v. Palm Beach Cnty. Sheriff's Off., 792 F.3d 1313, 1324 (11th Cir. 2015). The complaint "is guilty of the venial sin of being replete with conclusory, vague, and immaterial facts not obviously connected to any particular cause of action." See id. The complaint also violates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) because it does not contain "a short and plain statement of the claim[s] showing the [plaintiff] is entitled to relief." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). As a whole, the complaint is so vague and confusing that the defendants are not given sufficient notice as to the nature of the claims and the facts upon which they are based. See Jackson v. Bank of America, N.A., 898 F.3d 1348,1358 (11th Cir. 2018) ("The pleading is vague and ambiguous such that [the defendants have] to guess as to... the facts upon which [the plaintiff relies] in support.") (quotation omitted). Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint no later than September 8, 2026. The motion to proceed without costs (Doc. #2) is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff amends his complaint, he must pay the $405 filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis at the time that he files the amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to amend the complaint, submits another shotgun pleading, or does not pay the filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis, this action may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 8/24/2026. (RL)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to David D. Battle, Jr - A pro se litigant may consent to receive Notices of Electronic Filings by completing the consent form linked #here or by visiting the court's website at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/litigants-without-lawyers. (KCH) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by David D. Battle, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(KCH) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Virtually by David D. Battle, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(KCH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Electronic Filing Access and Registration for CM/ECF by David D. Battle, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(KCH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by David D. Battle, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope #2 Exhibit) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory D. Pizzo. (KCH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Express Company, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Firstsource Advantage, LLC, Radius Global Solutions, LLC, Trans Union LLC, Transworld Systems Inc. with Jury Demand filed by David D. Battle, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(KCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
