Redbrook v. Rydell et al
Plaintiff: James Irvin Redbrook
Defendant: District Attorney Alexandria Peyton Rydell, Brian GodCharles and Gayle Lorenzo
Case Number: 8:2026cv02682
Filed: September 16, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Lindsay S Griffin
Referring Judge: William F Jung
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee, initiated this action by filing #1 a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff is awaiting trial in Florida state court on a charge of resisting an officer with violence. State v. Redbrook, No. 25-CF-7005 (Fla. 13th Jud. Cir. Ct.). In his complaint, Plaintiff asserts a claim for malicious prosecution, alleging that his criminal charge is unlawful because he was having a "medical emergency" when he was arrested. Upon review, 28 U.S.C. 1915A, the Court concludes that this action must be dismissed without prejudice. To pursue a malicious prosecution claim, Plaintiff must establish (among other things) that "the criminal proceedings against him terminated in his favor." Luke v. Gulley, 975 F.3d 1140, 1144 (11th Cir. 2020). As explained above, Plaintiff's criminal case is ongoing. Therefore, he fails to meet the favorable termination requirement, and the malicious prosecution claim must be dismissed without prejudice as premature. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 489 (1994) ("[A] cause of action for malicious prosecution does not accrue until the criminal proceedings have terminated in the plaintiff's favor."). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against Plaintiff, terminate any pending motions as moot, and close this case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 9/16/2026. (MWC)
September 14, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION to Prosecute by James Irvin Redbrook. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(KCH)
September 14, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brian GodCharles, Gayle Lorenzo, and Alexandria Peyton Rydell filed by James Irvin Redbrook. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit and #2 Mailing Envelope) (No filing fee payment or IFP) (KCH) Modified on 9/16/2026 (KCH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redbrook v. Rydell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Irvin Redbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: District Attorney Alexandria Peyton Rydell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian GodCharles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gayle Lorenzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?