Velazquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Rosemary Leone Velazquez |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2026cv02697 |
| September 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:26-cv-02697-WFJ-AEP. (CTR) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Daniel Brady on behalf of Rosemary Leone Velazquez. Lead Counsel: Daniel J. Brady, Esq. (Brady, Daniel) Modified text on 9/16/2026 (CTR). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Rosemary Leone Velazquez. Related case(s): No (Brady, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Rosemary Leone Velazquez. (Brady, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner, Social Security Administration (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-25556836). The plaintiff declines consent to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Rosemary Leone Velazquez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brady, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
