Lankes v. Haleon US, Inc.
Plaintiff: Emily Lankes
Defendant: Haleon US, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2026cv02712
Filed: September 17, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Kathryn Kimball Mizelle
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER: The complaint (Doc. #1) invokes this Court subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332(d). To establish jurisdiction under Section 1332(d), the plaintiff must plausibly allege that "the aggregate amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000" and that "the proposed plaintiff class contains at least 100 members." See Smith v. Verra Mobility Corp., No. 8:25-CV-2300-KKM-NHA, 2026 WL 1673830, at *4 (M.D. Fla. June 10, 2026) (citation omitted). Without any elaboration as to the damages per putative class member, the complaint alleges that the "[t]he amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000... for the putative Class" and that thousands of putative class members exist. See Compl. 10, 73. Yet "conclusory allegations that [Section 1332] is satisfied [do] not suffice" to establish this Court's jurisdiction. See Progressive Mountain Ins. Co. v. Middlebrooks, 805 F. App'x 731, 737 (11th Cir. 2020) (citing Williams v. Best Buy Co. , 269 F.3d 1316, 1319-20 (11th Cir. 2001)). Beyond that, the plaintiff fails to allege any facts suggesting that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 for her individual claims. See 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). In the light of these limited allegations, I am skeptical that the plaintiff has plausibly alleged facts to invoke this Court's subject-matter jurisdiction under Section 1332. I thus order the plaintiff to show cause why her complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, in a brief not to exceed ten pages, no later than September 24, 2026. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 9/17/2026. (DRD)
September 17, 2026 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Haleon US, Inc. (CTR)
September 17, 2026 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:26-cv-02712-KKM-AAS. (CTR)
September 17, 2026 Filing 2 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CTR)
September 17, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Haleon US, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-25564086) filed by Emily Lankes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Geiger, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lankes v. Haleon US, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Lankes
Represented By: Bryan James Geiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haleon US, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?