Nassem v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Andrew Emad Shawky Nassem |
| Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 8:2026cv03435 |
| November 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anthony E. Porcelli |
| Mary S. Scriven |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1105 (a) Aliens:Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Fady Eskandar may appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, counsel shall comply with the fee and electronic filing requirements and file a notice of compliance with said requirements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 11/12/2026. (CPK)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Fady Eskandar to appear pro hac vice. (e-portal)(CTR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services(Tampa Field Office), U.S. Department of Homeland Security filed by Andrew Emad Shawky Nassem. (e-portal) (No Fee-No IFP) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CTR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
