TILLMAN v. RAHL et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv00132
Filed: June 29, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
Presiding Judge: ALLAN KORNBLUM
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: This matter is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Set Flags: Cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 9/17/2009. (jws)
May 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 28 Amended Complaint filed by CORNELIUS TILLMAN : It is recommended that Plaintiffs amended complaint, doc. 28 , be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and that the order adopting this report and recommendation direct the clerk of court to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 5/12/2009. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 6/9/2009. (kdm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TILLMAN v. RAHL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?