BROOKS v. GAINESVILLE SALVATION ARMY, et al
| RUFUS JAMES BROOKS, JR |
| CITY OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA and GAINESVILLE SALVATION ARMY |
| 1:2007cv00042 |
| March 15, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Gainesville Office |
| Alachua |
| ALLAN KORNBLUM |
| MAURICE M PAUL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 30 Report and Recommendation. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 5/27/2009. This case is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2), and the Clerk is directed to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (kdm)
|
|
Filing
30
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by RUFUS JAMES BROOKS, JR : It is recommended Pltf's 1 Complaint be DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S .C. §1915(e)(2), and that the order adopting this report and recommendation direct the clerk of court to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 4/10/2009. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 5/8/2009. (jws)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
