BETA UPSILON CHI UPSILON CHAPTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA v. MACHEN et al
| BETA UPSILON CHI UPSILON CHAPTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA and BETA UPSILON CHI INC |
| J BERNARD MACHEN, PATRICIA TELLES-IRVIN, EDDIE DANIELS, JR, CHRIS CUPOLI, CARLOS ALFONSO, C DAVID BROWN, II, COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, ROLAND C DANIELS, MANNY A FERNANDEZ, W A MCGRIFF, III, JOELEN MERKEL, DIANNA FULLER MORGAN, RYAN MOSELEY, CYNTHIA O'CONNELL, EARL W POWELL, ALFRED C WARRINGTON, IV and RICHARD A YOST |
| 1:2007cv00135 |
| July 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Gainesville Office |
| Alachua |
| ALLAN KORNBLUM |
| STEPHAN P MICKLE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
407
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES: Plaintiffs' 383 Amended Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED. As the prevailing party under § 1988, BYX is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $235,278.25 fo r work performed in this Court plus costs in the amount $1,237.59. For its work on the third appeal, BYX is awarded $29,443.75. The sum total of the attorney's fees and costs is $265,959.59. Clerk shall enter judgment stating, &qu ot;Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs, Beta Upsilon Chi and the Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter at the University of Florida, and against Defendants for attorney's fees and costs in the sum of $265,959.59, for which interest shall accrue as provided by law." Clerk shall close the case. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 10/1/2014. (jws)
|
|
Filing
347
ORDER: 345 Motion for Extension of Time to file a motion for reasonable appellate attorney's fees is GRANTED. 346 Motion for Order awarding reasonable attorney fees is GRANTED. Defendants shall pay plaintiffs $22,000 for reasonable attorney's fees in the fee entitlement appeal. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/15/2013. (jws)
|
|
Filing
344
ORDER: Plaintiffs' 343 Consent MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion Regarding Appellate Attorney's Fees is GRANTED. (Motion due by 1/4/2013.). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/28/2012. (jws)
|
|
Filing
322
ORDER: 296 Notice of Application to Have the Costs Taxed filed by Plaintiffs in amount of $752.15 is GRANTED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 7/30/2012. (jws)
|
|
Filing
321
ORDER denying 297 Motion for Reconsideration of 254 Order Denying Motion for Taxation of Costs filed by Plaintiffs. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 7/24/2012. (jws)
|
|
Filing
307
ORDER re Plaintiffs' 305 MOTION for Leave to File a Reply to Defendants' 299 Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 3/8/2012. (jws)
|
|
Filing
291
ORDER re 288 USCA Mandate, Plaintiffs entitled to reasonable attorney's fees as prevailing party under 42 U.S.C. 1988. Parties directed to confer w/n 14 days and Plaintiffs shall file a motion for atty fees by 2/1/2012. Defendants shall respond w/n 14 days if any opposition. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 2/17/2012)., Motions due by 2/1/2012.). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 1/3/2012. (jws)
|
|
Filing
254
ORDER DENYING 247 MOTION to Reconsider Denial of Taxation of Costs by Plaintiffs. 246 Denial of Taxation of Costs by the Clerk is AFFIRMED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 12/15/2010. (jws)
|
|
Filing
240
ORDER DISMISSING CASE as MOOT. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 9/29/2010. (jws)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
