ARDLEY v. ASTRUE
SYLVIA ARDLEY |
MICHAEL J ASTRUE |
1:2009cv00185 |
August 31, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Gainesville Office |
Alachua |
ALLAN KORNBLUM |
MAURICE M PAUL |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER granting 40 Motion for Attorney Fees by Plaintiff's counsel. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/12/2012. (jws) |
Filing 35 ORDER re 32 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED. Plaintiff's attorney awarded fees in the amount of $20,213.78. Defendant ordered to pay fee from plaintiff's past-due benefits being held by defendant. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/31/2011. (jws) |
Filing 31 ORDER re 28 MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act filed by SYLVIA ARDLEY. Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees under EAJA in the amount of $1,008.10, subject to any offsetting debt owed by the Plaintiff to the United States. If the agreement between Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel is such that these fees are assigned to Plaintiff Counsel,any fees or partial fees received by the Plaintiff are to be considered held in trust for, and payable to, Plaintiff's Counsel. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 2/23/2011. (jws) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting 23 Motion for Final Judgment by MICHAEL J ASTRUE. Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of the Plaintiff. Plaintiff is instructed that application for attorney fees under Equal Access to Justice Act must be filed within thirty (30) days of the entry of final judgment for that application to be timely. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 1/10/2011. (jws) |
Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 Report and Recommendation, re 12 Motion to Remand filed by MICHAEL J ASTRUE. ( Status Report due by 3/16/2010). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 1/19/2010. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings by the Appeals Council. (kdm) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 12 MOTION to Remand filed by MICHAEL J ASTRUE - It is recommended that Defendants motion to remand (doc. 12 ) be GRANTED, and this cause is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence six for further proceedings by the Appeals Council. The parties are directed to file a Status Report on or before March 16, 2009, advising the Court of the status of the administrative proceedings... Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 12/17/2009. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/14/2010. (kdm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ARDLEY v. ASTRUE | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SYLVIA ARDLEY | |
Represented By: | N ALBERT BACHARACH, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.