KRUGER v. ASTRUE

KRUGER v. ASTRUE

Plaintiff:	LINDA KRUGER
Defendant:	MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Case Number:	1:2010cv00070
Filed:	April 20, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office:	Gainesville Office
County:	Alachua
Presiding Judge:	MAURICE M PAUL
Presiding Judge:	WILLIAM C SHERRILL
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 3, 2010	Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 15 Report and Recommendation; GRANTING 14 Motion to Remand. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 11/3/2010. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment REVERSING the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits, and REMANDING the application to the Commissioner for rehearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and for the purposes stated in the motion. (kdm)
October 4, 2010	Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, re 14 MOTION to Remand, filed by MICHAEL J ASTRUE - Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court GRANT Defendant's motion for entry of judgment and remand, doc. 13 , DIRECT the Clerk to enter fin al judgment REVERSING the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits, and REMAND the application to the Commissioner for rehearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the purposes stated in the motion. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 10/04/2010. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 11/1/2010.) (krb)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 3, 2010

Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 15 Report and Recommendation; GRANTING 14 Motion to Remand. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 11/3/2010. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment REVERSING the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits, and REMANDING the application to the Commissioner for rehearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and for the purposes stated in the motion. (kdm)

October 4, 2010

Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, re 14 MOTION to Remand, filed by MICHAEL J ASTRUE - Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court GRANT Defendant's motion for entry of judgment and remand, doc. 13 , DIRECT the Clerk to enter fin al judgment REVERSING the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits, and REMAND the application to the Commissioner for rehearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the purposes stated in the motion. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 10/04/2010. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 11/1/2010.) (krb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KRUGER v. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: LINDA KRUGER
Represented By:	N ALBERT BACHARACH, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?