SWIFT v. BANCORPSOUTH BANK
Plaintiff: Shane Swift
Defendant: Bancorpsouth, Inc. d/b/a Bancorpsouth Bank
Case Number: 1:2010cv00090
Filed: May 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Walton
Presiding Judge: STEPHAN P MICKLE
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 6 Motion to Dismiss by BANCORPSOUTH BANK. The denial is without prejudice to Defendants opportunity to file another motion to dismiss directed toward the amended complaint. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 6/23/2010. (jws)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SWIFT v. BANCORPSOUTH BANK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shane Swift
Represented By: JEFFREY MILES OSTROW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bancorpsouth, Inc. d/b/a Bancorpsouth Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?