PLAYER v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Petitioner: LAMAR PLAYER
Respondent: SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 1:2010cv00105
Filed: June 11, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 11 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254, is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 9/24/2013. (jws)
April 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING 20 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response AND 22 Motion to Accept Response to Habeas Petition as Timely by FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL, WALTER MCNEIL, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 4/28/2011. (jws)
February 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING 18 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 1 Petition filed by WALTER MCNEIL. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 4/22/2011)., Replies due by 5/23/2011, if desired.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 2/18/2011. (jws)
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING 12 MOTION to Delete ground three of first amended petition filed by LAMAR PLAYER. Clerk shall serve copy of 11 First Amended Complaint w/order to Respondent and Atty General for State of Florida via certified mai l, return receipt requested. Proper defendant: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 2/21/2011)., Replies, if desired, due by 3/23/2011.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 11/23/2010. (jws) Copy of order and first amended complaint to Respondent and Florida Atty General via certified mail, return receipt requested.)
August 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by LAMAR PLAYER. Case is DISMISSED for failure to comply with an order of the court and failure to prosecute. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 8/3/2010. (jws)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PLAYER v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LAMAR PLAYER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?