MEADOWS v. CITY OF INGLIS et al
Plaintiff: JEAN M MEADOWS
Defendant: CITY OF INGLIS, TIMOTHY LETSON and BRANDON ROBERTS
Case Number: 1:2011cv00045
Filed: March 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Levy
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER: Per 92 , 94 settlement by the parties, this action is DISMISSED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/31/2012. (jws)
May 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER: 92 Motion to Stay proceedings pending ratification of settlement agreement by CITY OF INGLIS is GRANTED. This matter is STAYED for 30 days pending ratification of settlement agreement by the City of Inglis, Town Commission. (Deadline for clerk to check status of stay by 6/15/2012.). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 5/16/2012. (jws)
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER re 89 MOTION for Leave to File Unopposed Reply to Plaintiff's Response filed by CITY OF INGLIS is GRANTED. (Replies due by 5/7/2012.). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 4/30/2012. (jws)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER adopting 68 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants Letson and Roberts's motion for summary judgment based upon qualified immunity (doc. 47 ) is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on March 7, 2012. (pmc)
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER re 75 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 73 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count V filed by JEAN M MEADOWS is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall respond to defendant's motion for partial summary judgment no later than 10 days after service of interrogatory responses by CITY OF INGLIS. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 3/7/2012. (jws)
January 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER re 66 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery filed by JEAN M MEADOWS. (Discovery due by 5/1/2012.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 1/13/2012. (jws)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER granting 59 MOTION for Leave to File re 58 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by JEAN M MEADOWS, ( Miscellaneous (Surreply) Deadline - by 11/29/2011.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 11/15/11. (bkp)
November 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER re 56 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum filed by TIMOTHY LETSON, BRANDON ROBERTS is GRANTED. (Replies due by 11/15/2011.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 11/1/2011. (jws)
October 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER re 41 MOTION to Dismiss 39 Second Amended Complaint filed by TIMOTHY LETSON, CITY OF INGLIS, BRANDON ROBERTS is GRANTED. Counts III and VI of second amended complaint are DISMISSED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 10/3/2011. (jws)
August 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER DENYING 30 Motion to Dismiss Counts I and III of 16 First Amended Complaint. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 8/22/2011. (jws)
June 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER re 25 Motion to Quash is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 6/24/2011. (jws)
April 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by CITY OF INGLIS, BRANDON ROBERTS for more definitive statement - Plaintiff directed to replead causes of action to clearly specify which counts apply to which defendants; GRANTED w/leave to Plaintiff to amend complaint w/n 20 days after entry of this order. Defendants' time to answer is extended to 20 days after filing of amended complaint. (Amended Pleadings due by 5/10/2011.). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 4/20/2011. (jws)
March 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by CITY OF INGLIS, BRANDON ROBERTS. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 3/25/2011).). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/15/2011. (jws)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MEADOWS v. CITY OF INGLIS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEAN M MEADOWS
Represented By: RODNEY WARREN SMITH
Represented By: ROBERT PIERCE KELLEY, JR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF INGLIS
Represented By: JEFFREY DALE JENSEN
Represented By: THOMAS ROBERT UNICE, JR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIMOTHY LETSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRANDON ROBERTS
Represented By: JEFFREY DALE JENSEN
Represented By: THOMAS ROBERT UNICE, JR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?