KELLER v. LEVY COUNTY JAIL et al
MICHAEL R KELLER |
C HOLMES, LEVY COUNTY JAIL and RUSSELL HINOTE |
1:2011cv00077 |
April 26, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Gainesville Office |
Levy |
GARY R JONES |
MAURICE M PAUL |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 31 , granting first motion to dismiss 26 and denying as moot the second motion to dismiss 30 . Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on June 30, 2012. (aow) |
Filing 29 ORDER re 24 Request for attorney's fees and costs filed by RUSSELL HINOTE is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall pay the sum of $227.50 to Defendant as a sanction for the filing of Defendant's 24 motion to compel. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 5/15/2012. (jws) |
Filing 27 ORDER: Defendant is directed to submit an affidavit in support of his request for costs and attorney's fees incurred in bringing 24 MOTION to Compel. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if affidavit not filed earlier: 5/16/2012).). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 5/2/2012. (jws) |
Filing 25 ORDER re 24 MOTION to Compel filed by RUSSELL HINOTE is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant's request for attorney fees. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 4/30/2012).). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 4/16/2012. (jws) Modified on 4/17/2012 (jws). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.