DYSON v. PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC, et al
| RONNIE DYSON |
| PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC, DE BEAUBIEN KNIGHT SIMMONS MANTZARIS & NEAL LLP, PPL LEGAL CARE OF CANADA CORPORATION, ONE PRE-PAID WAY, PRE-PAID LEGAL CASUALTY INC, PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC OF FLORIDA, LEGAL SERVICES PLANS OF VIRGINIA INC and FRAMME LAW FIRM PC |
| 1:2011cv00134 |
| July 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Gainesville Office |
| Alachua |
| GARY R JONES |
| STEPHAN P MICKLE |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the Court. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 1/19/2012. (jws)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER re 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by RONNIE DYSON is GRANTED for purpose of reviewing sufficiency of complaint and amended complaint. Clerk directed to send Plaintiff a blank copy of civil rights complaint form for non-prisoners and instructions. Plaintiff shall file amended complaint, together w/identical copy for each Defendant. (Amended Pleadings due by 11/18/2011.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 10/31/2011. (Civil rights complaint form for non-prisoners w/instructions sent to Plaintiff.) (jws)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
