SMITH v. WAL-MART STORES INC
Plaintiff: BRANDON RICARDO SMITH
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES INC
Case Number: 1:2011cv00226
Filed: October 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Alachua
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Case is DISMISSED with prejudice. All pending motions in this case are DENIED as moot. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 12/4/2012. (jws)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER: 33 Motion to Strike 32 Answer to Amended Complaint by Plaintiff is DENIED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 6/25/2012. (jws)
May 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER: 21 Motion to Strike WAL-MART's 9 First Affirmative Defenses is TERMINATED as moot. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 5/2/2012. (jws)
April 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER: re 14 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Supplemental Complaint filed by BRANDON RICARDO SMITH is GRANTED. Clerk directed to send Plaintiff blank copy of Employment Discrimination Complaint Form for pro se litigants. P laintiff shall file completed second amended complaint w/identical copy. Defendant required to file response w/n 14 days of service of second amended complaint. (Amended Pleadings due by 5/4/2012.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 4/16/2012. (jws) (Complaint form per order sent to Plaintiff.)
April 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: Plaintiff's 13 MOTION to Deem Request for Admission Admitted is DENIED. Defendant's 16 MOTION to Strike is DENIED as moot and Request for attorney's fees and costs is DENIED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 4/4/2012. (jws)
October 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by BRANDON RICARDO SMITH: Clerk directed to complete summons form, USM 285 form and wavier of service forms for service upon Defendant's registered agent w/copy of this order and service copy of complaint. (Notify Chambers on 11/28/2011.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 10/25/2011. (Copy of complaint, order and completed summons, USM 285, waiver of service forms to USMS.) (jws)
October 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by BRANDON RICARDO SMITH: Plaintiff shall provide Clerk of Court w/one identical copy of complaint for service on Defendant. 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. (Service Copies due by 11/10/2011.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 10/20/2011. (jws)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. WAL-MART STORES INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRANDON RICARDO SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?