UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $92,075.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE $92, 075.00 CERTIFIED CHECK
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $92,075.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE $92, 075.00 CERTIFIED CHECK
Case Number: 1:2012cv00032
Filed: February 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Alachua
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $92,075.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE $92, 075.00 CERTIFIED CHECK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: GREGORY PATRICK MCMAHON
Represented By: ROBERT DEL STINSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $92,075.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE $92, 075.00 CERTIFIED CHECK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?