JACOBS v. TAKHAR COLLECTION SERVICES LTD et al
| DANIELLE JACOBS |
| TAKHAR COLLECTION SERVICES LTD and DOE |
| 1:2012cv00085 |
| April 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Gainesville Office |
| Alachua |
| GARY R JONES |
| MAURICE M PAUL |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER: Pursuant to 12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, claims against Defendent, DOE 1 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Clerk instructed to make the appropriate notation on the docket. Claims will proceed against Defendant, TAKHAR COLLECTION SERVICES LTD. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 9/18/2012. (jws)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER re 7 APPLICATION for Clerk's Entry of Default is GRANTED. Clerk is directed to enter a Clerk's default against TAKHAR COLLECTION SERVICES LTD. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 6/26/2012. (jws)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: Clerk directed to forward Plaintiff a copy of Fed.R.Civ.P.4, 2 blank summons forms, and 2 copies of Form 1A to request Defendants to waive formal service. If formal service attempted, Plaintiff return summons w/n 20 days to Clerk for issuance giving Defendants 21 days to respond to complaint. (Notify Chambers on 8/27/2012.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 4/30/2012. (Forwarded to Plaintiff forms per Order.) (jws)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
