NEVILLE v. COUNTY COURT OF ALACHUA COUNTY et al
| ROBERT NEVILLE |
| COUNTY COURT OF ALACHUA COUNTY, CIRCUIT COURT, DAVID KREIDER and PETER K SIEG |
| 1:2012cv00166 |
| July 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Gainesville Office |
| Alachua |
| GARY R JONES |
| STEPHAN P MICKLE |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "The case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the Court, for failure to prosecute, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 5/1/2013. (atm)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by ROBERT NEVILLE: Plaintiff shall file a notice as to his current custody status. Clerk directed to send Plaintiff a blank §1983 complaint form for prisoner litigants and a blank motion for IFP for use by a prisoner. Plaintiff shall file amended complaint completely replacing original complaint w/identical service copy for each defendant and either pay $350 filing fee or file a motion for IFP. (Amended Pleadings/Custody Status due by 8/20/2012., Fee/Motion for IFP due by 8/20/2012.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 7/19/2012. (jws) (Forms to Pla per Order.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
