BARBER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: EARL JEFFERY BARBER
Case Number: 1:2013cv00062
Filed: March 22, 2013
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Alachua
Referring Judge: GARY R JONES
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM STAFFORD
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 30, 2013 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 4/30/2013. The clerk is directed to enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED without prejudice." (kdm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARBER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EARL JEFFERY BARBER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.