JOHNSON v. BATES et al
| TABARUS ANTHONY JOHNSON |
| BRIAN BATES, GRIMS, BOBBY MERRIMAN, JOHN PATTEN, JOHNSON, AARON LEAVINGS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARTAIN, RICHARD LUKENS, BYRON DICKERSON, SUWANNEE CI ANNEX and LANDRUM |
| 1:2013cv00087 |
| May 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Gainesville Office |
| Alachua |
| GARY R JONES |
| STEPHAN P MICKLE |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER ADOPTING 66 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Defendants' 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 57 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff's 69 letter, construed as a motion to continue, is DENIED as moot. Clerk directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/26/2015. (jws)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Adopting in part 25 Report and Recommendations. Defendants' 9 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to all claims except Plaintiff's claim for denial of food. Plaintiff shall serve process on defendants JOHNSON and GRAND by 4/14/2014. Clerk directed to mail Plaintiff form for IFP if to receive assistance with service on Defendants. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/6/2014.(Motion for IFP due by 3/17/2014.) (jws)(Form to Pla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
