ROLAND v. MILLER et al
| GREGORY ROBERT ROLAND |
| LEVY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, GLENN BRYAN, MICHAEL BRYANT, JERRY MILLER and LEVY COUNTY BOARD OF JUSTICE |
| 1:2013cv00124 |
| June 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Gainesville Office |
| Levy |
| MARK E WALKER |
| GARY R JONES |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 6 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, and 7 Clerk's Judgment is SET ASIDE. Magistrate's 4 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED as the Court 9;s opinion. Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiffs 5 Request for compensation, and 2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED. This cause is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g) because Plaintiff has three strikes." Clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 7/22/2013. (jws)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as the Court's opinion. Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's 5 Request for Compensation and 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to 28 U.S.C.§1915(g) because Plaintiff has three strikes." Clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 7/18/2013. (jws)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
