BRIGHTMON v. BERRYHILL

BRIGHTMON v. BERRYHILL

Case Number:	1:2016cv00132
Filed:	January 22, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office:	Gainesville Office
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 24, 2019	Filing 38 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/23/2019. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "In light of the Joint Stipulation of the parties, ECF No. 36 , Plainti ff's petition for attorney's fees, ECF No. 34 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $10,245.48, along with costs of $218.00 and expenses of $26.18, for a total amount of $10,489.66. The Commissioner is afforded, however, the opportunity to offset from this amount any debt owed by the Plaintiff to the United States that may be identified by the Department of Treasury. Any ultimate distribution shall be made in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff." The Clerk shall close the file. (kdm)
January 22, 2019	Filing 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's petition for attorney's fees, ECF No. 34 , be GRANTED in light of the parties' stipulation and that the court award attorney's fees of $10, 245.48, $218.00 in costs, and $26.18 in expenses. The Commissioner should be afforded, however, the opportunity to offset from this amount any debt owed by the Plaintiff to the United States that may be identified by the Department of Tr easury and any ultimate distribution shall be made in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 1/22/19. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 2/19/2019. (amm)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 24, 2019

Filing 38 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/23/2019. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "In light of the Joint Stipulation of the parties, ECF No. 36 , Plainti ff's petition for attorney's fees, ECF No. 34 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $10,245.48, along with costs of $218.00 and expenses of $26.18, for a total amount of $10,489.66. The Commissioner is afforded, however, the opportunity to offset from this amount any debt owed by the Plaintiff to the United States that may be identified by the Department of Treasury. Any ultimate distribution shall be made in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff." The Clerk shall close the file. (kdm)

January 22, 2019

Filing 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's petition for attorney's fees, ECF No. 34 , be GRANTED in light of the parties' stipulation and that the court award attorney's fees of $10, 245.48, $218.00 in costs, and $26.18 in expenses. The Commissioner should be afforded, however, the opportunity to offset from this amount any debt owed by the Plaintiff to the United States that may be identified by the Department of Tr easury and any ultimate distribution shall be made in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 1/22/19. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 2/19/2019. (amm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRIGHTMON v. BERRYHILL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?