GONZALEZ et al v. PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
| Gonzalez, VICTOR GONZALEZ and MARIA HURTADO |
| PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION |
| 1:2016cv00198 |
| June 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re Doc 18 Case Transferred Out to Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division opened as case 3:16-cv-948. (jws) |
| Filing 18 Electronic Interdistrict Transfer to the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division located at 300 N Hogan St 9th Floor, Jacksonville, FL 32202. (jws) |
Filing 17
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE re #16 Unopposed Motion to Transfer Case to Middle District of Florida is GRANTED. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. The clerk must take all steps necessary to effect the transfer and close the Gainesville Division file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 7/25/2016. (jws)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Transfer Case to Middle District of Florida by VICTOR GONZALEZ. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 8/5/2016). (FENTON, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by VICTOR GONZALEZ identifying Corporate Parent PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION for VICTOR GONZALEZ.. (FENTON, MATTHEW) |
|
Filing 14
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 7/14/16 - Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 7/28/2016, Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/29/2016, Discovery due by 11/12/2016. (tss)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER DENYING #10 MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 7/14/16. (tss)
|
| Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION, filed by VICTOR GONZALEZ. (FENTON, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION. (STILLWAGON, BRYAN) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue by PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 7/25/2016). (STILLWAGON, BRYAN) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER ADMITTING BRYAN A STILLWAGON PRO HAC VICE and granting #8 Motion signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 7/6/16. (tss)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Bryan A. Stillwagon.( Filing fee $ 196 receipt number AFLNDC-3619810.) by PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION. (STILLWAGON, BRYAN) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by VICTOR GONZALEZ. PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION served on 6/20/2016, answer due 7/11/2016. (FENTON, MATTHEW) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 6/20/16. Walter V. Siebert is added for the Defendant. (tss)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Walter V. Bernie Siebert.( Filing fee $ 196 receipt number AFLNDC-3603915.) by PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing of Walter Vernon Siebert) (SIEBERT, WALTER) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION. (tss) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Summons to be Issued by VICTOR GONZALEZ (FENTON, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (FENTON, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION (Filing fee $400.), filed by Victor Gonzalez. (FENTON, MATTHEW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
