TAYLOR v. BERRYHILL
CLARENCE HARVEY TAYLOR |
NANCY A BERRYHILL |
1:2016cv00347 |
November 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Gainesville Office |
Alachua |
William Terrell Hodges |
GARY R JONES |
Retirement and Survivors Benefits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 30 Report and Recommendation.. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is affirmed. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 3/12/18. (bkp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: TAYLOR v. BERRYHILL | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CLARENCE HARVEY TAYLOR | |
Represented By: | N ALBERT BACHARACH, JR |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL | |
Represented By: | PETER GUNNAR FISHER |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.