HARRIS v. BERRYHILL

Plaintiff: Danny Darrell Harris
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Case Number: 1:2017cv00281
Filed: November 8, 2017
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Alachua
Presiding Judge: MARK E WALKER
Referring Judge: CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 7, 2018 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 14 Report and Recommendation. The decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiffs application for Social Security benefits is AFFIRMED and judgment entered for the Defendant. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 9/7/18. (bkp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARRIS v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Darrell Harris
Represented By: STACEY B DEVEAUX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?