RICKETTS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
| DAWN RICKETTS |
| STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2018cv00170 |
| September 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| MARK E WALKER |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Joint Discovery Status Report by STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (BOWEN, JESSICA) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #5 Initial Scheduling Order - Status Report due by 10/5/2018. (None filed to date.) (kdm) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER entered pursuant to #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting and signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 10/5/18. Discovery due by 1/7/2019. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 1/28/2019. Mediation Report due by 3/4/2019. Jury Trial set for 5/29/2019 at 08:30 AM in U.S. Courthouse Gainesville before CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER. Case referred to mediation. (tss)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (kdm) |
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (BOWEN, JESSICA) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by BENNETT ASBURY HUTSON on behalf of DAWN RICKETTS (HUTSON, BENNETT) |
|
Filing 5
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 9/6/18. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 9/20/2018. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/22/2018. Discovery due by 1/5/2019. Status Report due by 10/5/2018. Plaintiff's counsel served by email. (bkp)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing State Court Documents by STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (BOWEN, JESSICA) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. (BOWEN, JESSICA) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (BOWEN, JESSICA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY from Eighth Judicial Circuit - Alachua, case number 2018-CA-2520. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4278789.), filed by STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. (BOWEN, JESSICA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RICKETTS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | JESSICA M BOWEN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAWN RICKETTS | |
| Represented By: | BENNETT ASBURY HUTSON |
| Represented By: | PAUL BRUCE BROCKWAY |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
