HUNTER v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: SUSAN MARIE HUNTER
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL
Case Number: 1:2018cv00193
Filed: September 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Referring Judge: MARK E WALKER
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, STRIKING #12 Notice (Other) filed by SUSAN MARIE HUNTER. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that this case be dismissed for abuse of the judicial process, for failure to comply with the Court's orders, and for failure to prosecute. R&R flag set ( Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 12/13/2018.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 11/15/18. (bkp) Modified on 11/16/2018 (ecb).
November 14, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #12 NOTICE Of Cause And Statement Of Claim. (Show Cause Response due by 11/12/2018 - none filed to date.) (kdm)
November 13, 2018 Filing 12 ** STRICKEN re: #13 ORDER ** NOTICE Of Cause And Statement Of Claim by SUSAN MARIE HUNTER. (kdm) Modified on 11/15/2018 (bkp).
October 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff's third "Notice of Emergency Writ of Quo Warranto" ECF No. #10 , is STRICKEN. Show Cause Response due by 11/12/2018. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 10/31/2018. (atm)
October 30, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #5 Order -- Complaint for Review of Adverse Social Security Decision and Motion for IFP due by 10/27/2018. (None filed to date.) (kdm)
October 30, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #10 (Third) NOTICE of Emergency Writ of quo warranto. (kdm)
October 29, 2018 Filing 10 **STRICKEN PER #11 ORDER** (Third) NOTICE of Emergency Writ of quo warranto by SUSAN MARIE HUNTER. (kdm) Modified on 10/31/2018 (atm).
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER striking #8 NOTICE of Emergency Writ of quo warranto. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 10/25/2018. Plaintiff is WARNED that the filing of repetitive and legally baseless "notices" will result in the imposition of sanctions, which could include dismissal of this case. (kdm)
October 24, 2018 Filing 8 *** STRICKEN PER #9 ORDER *** -- NOTICE of Emergency Writ of quo warranto by SUSAN MARIE HUNTER. (kdm) Modified on 10/25/2018 to add text(kdm).
October 24, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #8 NOTICE of Emergency Writ of quo warranto. (kdm)
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER striking #6 NOTICE of Writ of quo warrants. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 10/17/2018. (kdm)
October 16, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #6 NOTICE of Writ of quo warrants. (kdm)
October 15, 2018 Filing 6 *** STRICKEN PER #7 ORDER *** --- NOTICE of Writ of quo warrants by SUSAN MARIE HUNTER. (kdm) Modified on 10/17/2018 to add text (kdm).
September 28, 2018 Set Deadlines per #5 ORDER: Complaint for Review of Adverse Social Security Decision due by 10/27/2018; Motion for IFP due by 10/27/2018. (kdm)
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER striking #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 9/27/2018. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must file a completed and signed form (under penalty of perjury) on or before October 27, 2018. The Clerk must send Plaintiff a form Complaint for Review of Adverse Social Security Decision. (Mailed as directed above.) (kdm)
September 24, 2018 Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se. Mailed to: SUSAN MARIE HUNTER, POST BOX SEVENTY, ISLAND GROVE, FL 32654-9998. (kdm)
September 24, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint (One service copy received, no fee paid, motion for IFP received), #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to GARY R JONES. (kdm)
September 21, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (kdm)
September 21, 2018 Filing 2 ** STRICKEN PER #5 ORDER ** -- MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SUSAN MARIE HUNTER. (kdm) Modified on 9/28/2018 to add text (kdm).
September 21, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NANCY A BERRYHILL, filed by SUSAN MARIE HUNTER. (One service copy received, no fee paid, motion for IFP received.) (kdm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HUNTER v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SUSAN MARIE HUNTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?