JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
| BRODERICK JOHNSON |
| STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 1:2018cv00199 |
| September 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 11/19/18. Show Cause Response due by 12/19/2018. (bkp)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order, (Amended Petition along with two service copies due by 11/5/2018) - none filed. (atm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER - The Clerk must forward to Petitioner a blank Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Amended Petition along with two service copies due by 11/5/2018). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 10/3/2018 - form sent as directed. (atm)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (atm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (atm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by BRODERICK JOHNSON with (2) service copies. (Attachments: #1 attachment, #2 receipt) - petition not signed (atm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
