BRANCH-HAINES v. WAFFLE HOUSE INC et al
ROSETTA BRANCH-HAINES |
WAFFLE HOUSE INC and JOHN DOE |
1:2018cv00229 |
November 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
GARY R JONES |
MARK E WALKER |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER RESETTING JURY TRIAL pursuant to #14 Notice of Trial Conflict filed by WAFFLE HOUSE INC signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/7/19. Jury Trial set for 11/19/2019 at 08:30 AM in U.S. Courthouse Gainesville before CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER. (tss) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Trial Conflict by WAFFLE HOUSE INC re #12 Scheduling Order,, Case Referred to Mediation, (YOUNG, KIMBERLY) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF SERVING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE AND PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES by ROSETTA BRANCH-HAINES (CHESTNUT, CHRISTOPHER) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER entered pursuant to #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/28/18. Discovery due by 6/3/2019, Dispositive Motions to be filed by 6/24/2019, Mediation Report due by 7/15/2019, and Jury Trial set for 10/29/2019 at 08:30 AM in U.S. Courthouse Gainesville before CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER. (tss) |
Filing 11 ORDER WITHDRAWING #10 REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/28/18. The #10 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge entered December 27, 2018, is withdrawn and this Court shall enter its Scheduling and Mediation Order. (tss) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Clerk to prepare PTO by 5/3/2019. (tss) |
Filing 10 WITHDRAWN PER #11 ORDER ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R. JONES. This case is reassigned to a magistrate judge for all further proceedings, including trial, directing the entry of judgment, and post-judgment matters SEE Doc #9 . Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/27/18. (bkp) Modified on 12/28/2018 (tss). |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #10 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (bkp) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (kdm) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (YOUNG, KIMBERLY) |
Filing 8 STATUS REPORT on Discovery by WAFFLE HOUSE INC. (YOUNG, KIMBERLY) |
Filing 7 NOTICE Pendency of Other Actions by WAFFLE HOUSE INC (YOUNG, KIMBERLY) |
Filing 6 RULE 26 Disclosures by WAFFLE HOUSE INC. (YOUNG, KIMBERLY) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by WAFFLE HOUSE INC. (YOUNG, KIMBERLY) |
Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 11/21/18. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 12/5/2018. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/4/2019. Discovery due by 3/20/2019. Status Report due by 12/21/2018. (bkp) |
Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Demand for Jury Trial by WAFFLE HOUSE INC. (YOUNG, KIMBERLY) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (atm) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WAFFLE HOUSE INC from CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY FLORIDA, case number 2018-CA-003334, filed by WAFFLE HOUSE INC. (atm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.