MYERS ET AL v. UNDERGROUND PIPELINE REHABILITATION INC ET AL
Quinshell Myers and Towanda Myers |
Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc., William J. Hardee, UNDERGROUND PIPELINE REHABILITATION INC and WILLIAM J HARDEE |
1:2019cv00063 |
April 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
GARY R JONES |
MARK E WALKER |
ALLEN C WINSOR |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 STATUS REPORT JOINT STATUS REPORT REGARDING DISCOVERY JULY 2019 by QUINSHELL MYERS, TOWANDA MYERS. (RUSH, MARIAN) |
Filing 14 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to JUDGE ALLEN C WINSOR for all further proceedings. CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER no longer assigned to case. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 6/26/2019. (erl)**Please use the new judge's initials for all future filings: 1:19cv63-AW/GRJ. |
Filing 13 STATUS REPORT JOINT STATUS REPORT REGARDING DISCOVERY by QUINSHELL MYERS, TOWANDA MYERS. (RUSH, MARIAN) |
Filing 12 RULE 26 Disclosures by UNDERGROUND PIPELINE REHABILITATION INC. (COLE, BLAKE) |
Filing 11 RULE 26 Disclosures by QUINSHELL MYERS, TOWANDA MYERS. (RUSH, MARIAN) |
Filing 10 REPLY by TOWANDA MYERS, QUINSHELL MYERS re #5 Notice (Other) PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANT WILLIAM HARDEES AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by TOWANDA MYERS, QUINSHELL MYERS. (RUSH, MARIAN) |
Filing 9 PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO UNDERGROUND PIPELINES AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ANSWER to Complaint by QUINSHELL MYERS, TOWANDA MYERS. (RUSH, MARIAN) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings CRD to prepare PTO by 9/9/2019. (tss) |
Filing 8 CASE REFERRED to Mediation. (bkp) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER Re: #6 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 5/10/19. Discovery due by 10/9/2019. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 10/30/2019. Jury Trial set for 2/25/2020 08:30 AM in U.S. Courthouse Gainesville before CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER. Mediation to take place by 11/6/2019. Mediation Report due by 11/20/2019. (bkp) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #6 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (bkp) |
Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (RUSH, MARIAN) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed Re: #2 Initial Scheduling Order -- Status Report due by 5/8/2019. (None filed to date.) (kdm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing State Court Documents by UNDERGROUND PIPELINE REHABILITATION INC (COLE, BLAKE) Modified on 5/8/2019 to add text(kdm). |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING #3 SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Attorney FRANK H COLE, III terminated. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/16/2019. Defendants shall continue to be represented by Blake H. Cole. (kdm) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by UNDERGROUND PIPELINE REHABILITATION INC. (COLE, BLAKE) |
Filing 2 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/9/19. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 4/23/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/23/2019. Discovery due by 8/8/2019. Status Report due by 5/8/2019. (bkp) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. from Eighth Judicial Circuit, Alachua County, Florida, case number 2019-CA-000016. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4451034.), filed by Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc.. (COLE, FRANK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.