SANDERS v. BROOME
| ROSALYN SANDERS |
| ELIZABETH BROOME |
| 1:2019cv00210 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| ALLEN C WINSOR |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 12/10/19. Show Cause Response due by 1/9/2020. (bkp)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #4 Order - nothing filed to date - see #5 entry (tss) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #1 , #3 MOTIONs For Appointment Of Counsel. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 10/30/2019. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff (1) a blank Civil Rights Complaint Form To Be Used By Prisoners In Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 1983; and (2) a blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis, with the Prisoner Consent and Financial Certificate form. Plaintiff shall file a complaint using the appropriate pro se form on or before November 29, 2019. Plaintiff shall either pay the $400.00 filing fee or file a properly completed motion for leave to proceed as a pauper, together with a certified copy of her six-month inmate account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint, on or before November 29, 2019. If Plaintiff does not wish to proceed with her case in this Court, Plaintiff shall file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (without prejudice) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) on or before November 29, 2019. (kdm) (Mailed as stated above.)
|
| Set Deadline per #4 Order: Civil Rights Complaint due by 11/29/2019., Motion for IFP or Fee due by 11/29/2019., Plaintiff does not wish to proceed with her case - Plaintiff shall file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (without prejudice) - by 11/29/2019. (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #3 (Second) MOTION for Appointment Of Counsel. Referred to GARY R JONES. (kdm) |
| Filing 3 (Second) MOTION for Appointment Of Counsel by ROSALYN SANDERS. (kdm) |
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se. Mailed to: ROSALYN SANDERS, 209469, LOWELL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 11120 NW GAINESVILLE RD, OCALA, FL 34482. (kdm) |
| Filing 1 MOTION For Appointment Of Counsel by ROSALYN SANDERS. (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #1 MOTION For Appointment Of Counsel. Referred to GARY R JONES. (kdm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SANDERS v. BROOME | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ROSALYN SANDERS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ELIZABETH BROOME | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
