LAUFER v. ASHTON, LLP
| DEBORAH LAUFER |
| ASHTON, LLP and ASHTON LLP |
| 1:2019cv00279 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| ALLEN C WINSOR |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by ASHTON LLP (UNRUH, JESSE) |
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #7 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TORESPOND TO COMPLAINT signed by JUDGE ALLEN C WINSOR on 12/19/19. Answer due by 1/13/2020. (tss)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply up to and including January 13, 2020 by ASHTON LLP. (UNRUH, JESSE) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DEBORAH LAUFER. ASHTON LLP served on 12/2/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (CULLEN, PHILIP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of No Similar Case by DEBORAH LAUFER (CULLEN, PHILIP) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by DEBORAH LAUFER. (CULLEN, PHILIP) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ASHTON LLP. (atm) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (CULLEN, PHILIP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ASHTON, LLP ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4700109.), filed by DEBORAH LAUFER. (Attachments: #1 SUMMONS) (CULLEN, PHILIP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
