RIVAS II v. JUUL LABS INC et al
| Steven Rivas II and STEVEN RIVAS, II |
| JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA GROUP INC, JUUL LABS INC, PAX LABS INC and PHILIP MORRIS USA INC |
| 1:2019cv00307 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| ALLEN C WINSOR |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Inter-district Transfer to the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102-3434 re MDL 2913 (atm) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFIED CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-16) re MDL 2913 to Northern District of California (Attachments: #1 email request) (atm) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ALTRIA GROUP INC, JUUL LABS INC, PAX LABS INC, PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons, #3 summons) (atm) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (atm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4724920.), filed by Steven Rivas II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Proposed Summons - JUUL, #3 Exhibit Proposed Summons - PAX, #4 Exhibit Proposed Summons - Altria, #5 Exhibit Proposed Summons - Philip) (MORGAN, TIMOTHY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
