PROVINO v. RICKARDS, et al
Plaintiff: R M PROVINO
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and SUSAN LOUISE RICKARDS
Case Number: 1:2021cv00054
Filed: March 31, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Referring Judge: MARK E WALKER
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2021 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint - It is recommended that this case be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 5/25/2021. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 6/22/2021. (kdm)
May 21, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #5 Order - Show Cause Response due by 5/20/2021. (***None filed to date.***) (kdm)
May 7, 2021 Set Deadline per #5 Order: Show Cause Response due by 5/20/2021. (kdm)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 5/6/2021. Plaintiff must show cause on or before May 20, 2021. (kdm)
April 2, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (titled: Affidavit of Indigency) by R M PROVINO. (kdm)
April 2, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (titled: Affidavit of Indigency). Referred to GARY R JONES. (kdm)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Complaint.(Fee ($402.00) or Motion for IFP due by 5/1/2021). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 4/1/2021. The Clerk must send Plaintiff a blank complaint form for nonprisoner plaintiffs and the forms necessary to seek leave to proceed as a pauper. (kdm) (Mailed as directed above.)
March 31, 2021 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se. Mailed to: R M PROVINO, 12800 UNIVERSITY DR, SU 600, FT MYERS, FL 33907. (kdm)
March 31, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, SUSAN LOUISE RICKARDS, filed by R M PROVINO. (No service copies received, no fee paid, no motion for IFP received.) (kdm)
March 31, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, (No service copies received, no fee paid, no motion for IFP received). (kdm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PROVINO v. RICKARDS, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R M PROVINO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUSAN LOUISE RICKARDS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?