DIXON v. SAUL
| Marlyn Dixon and MARLYN DIXION |
| ANDREW SAUL |
| 1:2021cv00102 |
| June 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| ALLEN C WINSOR |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (kdm) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 6/4/2021. The Clerk is directed to issue Plaintiff's proposed summonses and the forms necessary for service by the U.S. Marshal, stating that Defendant has sixty (60) days to respond. The Clerk must send the prepared summonses, four certified copies of this order, service copies of the Complaint, and the prepared USM 285 forms to the U.S. Marshal. (kdm) (Forwarded as directed above.)
|
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to GARY R JONES. (kdm) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by Marlyn Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (HARRIS, SUZANNE) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marlyn Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in support of Forma Pauperis) (HARRIS, SUZANNE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
