STROZIER v. WALMART INC et al
| TIMOTHY STROZIER |
| WALMART INC and APEX MEDICAL CORPORATION |
| 1:2021cv00155 |
| September 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT Of Financial Status by TIMOTHY STROZIER. (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #10 AFFIDAVIT Of Financial Status. (kdm) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 MOTION for Reconsideration and/or Clarification. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 11/8/2021. The Clerk must send Plaintiff a blank affidavit of indigency. In order to proceed with this case, Plaintiff must complete the affidavit in its entirety and file it with the Court on or before November 29, 2021. Alternatively, Plaintiff must pay the $402.00 filing fee on or before November 29, 2021. (kdm) (Mailed as directed above.)
|
| Set Deadline per #9 ORDER: Financial affidavit or alternatively pay the $402.00 filing fee due on or before 11/29/2021. (kdm) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration and/or Clarification re #7 ORDER by TIMOTHY STROZIER. (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION for Reconsideration and/or Clarification re #7 ORDER. Referred to GARY R JONES. (kdm) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #6 FIRST AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Filing Fee ($402.00) due by 11/24/2021). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 10/25/2021. (kdm)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, (No service copies received), #6 FIRST AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (Affidavit of Financial Status attached). Referred to GARY R JONES. (kdm) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TIMOTHY STROZIER. (Affidavit of Financial Status attached.) (kdm) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against APEX MEDICAL CORPORATION, WALMART INC, filed by TIMOTHY STROZIER. (No service copies received.) (kdm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (First Amended Complaint due by 10/29/2021., Affidavit of indigency or Fee ($402.00) due by 10/29/2021). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 9/29/2021. The Clerk must send Plaintiff a blank affidavit of indigency. The Clerk must send Plaintiff a blank civil complaint form for nonprisoner litigants. (kdm) (Mailed as directed above.)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se. Mailed to: TIMOTHY STROZIER, 3901 NW 79TH AVE, STE 245 #3217, MIAMI, FL 33166. (kdm) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #1 COMPLAINT, (No service copies received, no fee paid, motion for IFP received), #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (Affidavit of Financial Status attached). Referred to GARY R JONES. (kdm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TIMOTHY STROZIER. (Affidavit of Financial Status attached.) (kdm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against APEX MEDICAL CORPORATION, WALMART INC, filed by TIMOTHY STROZIER. (No service copies received, no fee paid, motion for IFP received.) (kdm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
