WELLS FARGO BANK NA v. RODRIGUEZ et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and WELLS FARGO BANK NA |
| Keisha Rodriguez, TNVC, Inc. and TNVC INC |
| 1:2022cv00032 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| GARY R JONES |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER CLOSING THE FILE, re #6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 2/22/2022. This order confirms that the case has been dismissed. The clerk must close the file. (kdm)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by WELLS FARGO BANK NA (BURACK, SETH) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WELLS FARGO BANK NA. TNVC INC served on 2/7/2022, answer due 2/28/2022. (BURACK, SETH) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WELLS FARGO BANK NA. KEISHA RODRIGUEZ served on 2/9/2022, answer due 3/2/2022. (BURACK, SETH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to KEISHA RODRIGUEZ, TNVC INC. (kdm) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (BURACK, SETH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Keisha Rodriguez, TNVC, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6662118.), filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Summons on Keisha, #3 Summons on TNVC) (BURACK, SETH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
