BRAVO v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
FL Pedro Andres Bravo and PEDRO ANDRES BRAVO |
Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida and SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
1:2022cv00069 |
March 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
GARY R JONES |
ALLEN C WINSOR |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 6/2/2022). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Record on (direct) Appeal in First District Court of Appeal 1D14-4141 (without photographs), #2 Exhibit B. Trial Transcript (without jury selection) in Alachua County Case 2012CF003821, #3 Exhibit C. Transcript of Motion for New Trial in Alachua County Case 2012CF003821, #4 Exhibit D. Appellants Initial Brief in First District Court of Appeal 1D14-4141, #5 Exhibit E. Appellees Answer Brief in First District Court of Appeal 1D14-4141, #6 Exhibit F. Appellants Reply Brief in First District Court of Appeal 1D14-4141, #7 Exhibit G. Opinion & Mandate in First District Court of Appeal 1D14-4141, #8 Exhibit H. Record on (3.800a) Appeal in First District Court of Appeal 1D18-1057, #9 Exhibit I. Appellants Initial Brief in First District Court of Appeal 1D18-1057, #10 Exhibit J. Opinion & Mandate in First District Court of Appeal 1D18-1057, #11 Exhibit K. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel in 1D18-5208, #12 Exhibit L. Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel in First District Court of Appeal 1D18-5208, #13 Exhibit M. Order Denying Rehearing in First District Court of Appeal 1D18-5208, #14 Exhibit N. Record on (3.850) Appeal in First District Court of Appeal 1D21-791, #15 Exhibit O. Appellants Initial Brief in First District Court of Appeal 1D21-791, #16 Exhibit P. Printout of Online Docket in First District Court of Appeal 1D21-791, #17 Exhibit Q. Opinion & Mandate in First District Court of Appeal 1D21-791) (SIMCOX, HOLLY) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by HOLLY NOEL SIMCOX on behalf of SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (SIMCOX, HOLLY) |
Filing 5 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by PEDRO ANDRES BRAVO. The Clerk shall serve a copy of the Petition, ECF No. #1 , along with this Order, on Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida via regular mail. (Respondent's Answer due by 6/20/2022. Petitioner Replies due by 7/20/2022). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 3/22/2022. (atm) - copies sent as directed. |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 3/22/2022. (atm) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Pedro Andres Bravo. (UFFERMAN, MICHAEL) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Referred to GARY R JONES. (kdm) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (UFFERMAN, MICHAEL) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLNDC-6840633.), filed by Pedro Andres Bravo. (UFFERMAN, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.