JESSE BELL v. RICKY DIXON
| Jesse Bell |
| Secretary RICKY DIXON and RICKY DIXON |
| 1:2022cv00211 |
| August 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER. Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel, ECF No. #1 , is GRANTED and the Capital Habeas Unit of the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Northern District of Florida is appointed as counsel for Petitioner for all purposes listed in 18 U.S.C. 3599. Petitioner's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ECF No. #2 , is GRANTED. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/20/2022. (mb)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jesse Bell. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix) (MCDERMOTT, LINDA) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Motion for Appointment of Counsel , filed by Jesse Bell. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (MCDERMOTT, LINDA) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Miscellaneous Relief, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (mb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
